1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 | On this day at 1000 hours, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado conducted an unannounced comlaint investigation visit to deliver the findings for complaint allegations received. LPA met with administrator/licensee Garry Sneper and explained purpose of today's visit.
Regarding the allegations above, it was discovered that R1 had a history of UTI and was taking medication that caused R1 to urinate more frequently and it was noted that staff did recognize a change in the urine and it was reported to physician of R1 and they did notice that R1 was tired and quiet but that was baseline of R1. Upon the death of R1 it was noted that sepsis related to UTI were contributing factors but medical review and interviews showed that there were no indications or changes in the condition of R1 to indicate she was suffering a UTI to alert staff to send R1 to hospital.
Regarding sustained a prohibted helath condition while in care, the facility staff did indicate the changes in urine and change in being more tired and quiet but this did not lead to any susupicions of sepsis or UTI as R1 baseline was similar. Staff did not have any other signs or symptoms to alert that the resident had a prohibited health condition.
Regarding staff mishanlding resdient belongins, LPA could not prove or disprove those items were in place or not at time of admission. The facility indicated that they did keep the belondings of R1the room and did not remove anything and returned everything that was present. Any other items around the room of R1 were left in place for family to retrieve. This is one party's word over another.
Based on these observations, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations are unsubstantiated at this time.
Report is discussed with administrator. |