1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Furthermore, LPA interviewed resident #2 (R2) who stated that R1 needed a lot of help from staff but when staff attempted to help R1, R1 became combative and the facility had an extra staff to help R1.
Base on observation, and interviews during the course of investigation, this allegation is unsubstantiated, no neglect was observed.
Regarding to the allegation of facility is malodorous, the reporting party stated that when the responsible party visited R1, the responsible party smelled urine and feces in R1's room.
As part of the investigation, LPA interviewed the administrator who acknowledged that R1's room had an unpleasant smell as R1 urinated on the floor, and had bowel movements in the closet on a daily basis. Facility staff did the best they could to clean the room and get rid of the odor.
LPA interviewed R2 who stated that facility staff do a good job with cleaning and the facility is always cleaned.
During the investigation, LPA toured the facility and resident's room and observed it to be cleaned, odorless and tidy.
Base on observations and interviews during the course of investigation, this allegation is unsubstantiated.
Although the above investigations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
This report is reviewed and discussed with the administrator. |