1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | According to staff #1 (S1), the loft in the garage attic was a living space for S1 and staff # (2) S2 and the Accessary Dwelling Unit (ADU) in the backyard was a living space for staff # 3(S3) who was an on-call staff, but when S3 was informed that he/she could no longer stay there about a couple weeks ago, he/she stop working at the facility.
According to S1 and staff # 4 (S4), they did not know when the garage attic and the ADU were build but they stated that the garage attic was used for isolation for staff who tested possible for COVID-19 during the pandemic.
According to the administrator, the garage attic and the ADU were intended to be used for staff isolation during the Pandemic and they continued to be used as such after the Pandemic.
In addition, the administrator stated they are in process of getting a building permit for the ADU.
Based on observations, and interviews during the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, this allegations were determined to be substantiated. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC9099-D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties.
Report was discussed with the administrator. A copy is provided and Appeal Rights.
|