1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | These behaviors have an outlined strategy on how staff would address them if it happened. Part of the strategies to de-escalate the behavior is to speak to R1 in a friendly and gentle tone, reinforce communication attempts, going on a walk, offering movement opportunities, access to preferred leisure toys and activities, use one-step directions that are known and can do (stop, sit down), provide R1 with tangible preferred items that will act as competing stimulus for flinging. Due to these types of behaviors, the staff are trained by PD who is a certified Professional Assault Crisis Trainer. The training includes workshops in Professional Assault Crisis Training with different focuses one of which is making restraint as last resort.
During the visit, it was also observed that R1 has 2 assigned staff. R1 has adjusted to the staff since he/she first started in the program.
For the allegation of Staff did not provide appropriate activities and engagement for client needs, RP reported that programming at the facility appears inconsistent and inadequate. Programming appears to only happen between 10:00 AM and 1:00 PM due to transportation to and from the program. Additionally, on multiple visits, upon entering the facility, only 2-3 participants were being engaged by staff. Nearly all participants were in the large room. While 1 or 2 may have been using an iPad, most of the other participants were sitting with no activities or materials.
RP also added that when asked about the inactivity, management frequently repeated, “We can’t force them to do anything, they have rights.” This suggests a lack of understanding that is hard to fathom in a program of this kind, where engagement and structured activities should be a fundamental component of service. During one of the visits, it was implied that participants were going on a bowling outing, but the outing never happened. When asked a participant about it, he/she said, “That rarely happens.” This raises concerns about whether outings and other scheduled activities are actually taking place or if they are being used as placeholders rather than meaningful opportunities for engagement.
page 3 of 4 |