1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA interviewed four family members of different residents and three of them mentioned that there were no issues with regards to feeding and hydrating the residents. However, one family member mentioned instances where resident wasn’t assisted during the time when family member visited. This instance was addressed by the family to the administrator. Four out of four residents were interviewed however not able to get some answers due to cognitive diagnosis.
Regarding the allegation that Staff did not allow resident to have a visitor, according to reporting party, the director yelled at RP and "banned" RP from seeing the resident and entering the facility.
Based on interviews and record reviews, the reporting party was told to leave the facility but was not banned. Since RP was violating personal rights of the resident, RP was asked to leave. RPs family member came back to the facility and was able to discharge the resident. RP did not know that he/she would be able to enter because he/she was not there the day the resident was discharged. Interviewed four residents but couldn’t get definitive answers due to cognitive diagnosis. LPA interviewed 4 family members and all of them confirmed that they can visit in the facility at any time with no issues.
Regarding the allegation that due to staff negligence, resident (R1) had multiple witnessed falls causing injury, according to reporting party, R1 had multiple falls causing bruises on R1s shins, face, elbows, arms, and legs.
Based on interviews and record reviews, these incidents were submitted to CCLD. R1 had only two falls that were reported. These were reported to CCLD, PCP, and responsible party. Facility reassessed R1 but couldn’t have these signed and filed due to R1 being discharged from the facility. Facility protocol for falls include calling 911 if needed, reassess residents, and work with family members for reappraisal to address resident needs. These reappraisals help with the decision if residents would need a higher level of care.
Therefore, based on the interviews conducted, files reviewed, and information collected, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
Report is reviewed with Administrator; Ollie Vance and a copy is provided. |