1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LIC9099 - Page 2
In regards to the allegation of, facility staff did not allow resident to have visits outside of the facility. It was again the directive of the POA on file to not allow outside visits with the resident as a heath and safety concern. The facility also saw that this could be a health and safety risk as the resident does have a diagnosis and other physical limitations that would be difficult for a visitor that is not the POA to be able to handle outside of the care setting. As a health and safety risk this directive was being followed by the facility.
In regards to the allegation of, facility staff did not treat resident with dignity and respect. It was discovered based on interviews that the visitor requested to visit at a specific time and day. Facility staff prepared the visit for the resident and the visitor who arrived 25 minutes after the stated time. The resident was in a public space observable by staff to enable supervision of the resident to ensure the health and safety of the resident prior to the arrival of the visitor. Staff were present in the area to ensure this. The resident was not in put in a situation that would infringe on his/her personal rights in being treated with dignity and respect. LPA could not prove or disprove that the resident was not treated with dignity and respect as it is one party's word over another in regards to the situation.
Based on these observations, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations are unsubstantiated at this time.
No citation issued.
Report is reviewed with business office manager David |