1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA interviewed resident # 2 (R2) who stated that staff are assisting and providing the care that R2 is required.
LPA interviewed staff #1 (S1) who stated that they offered R1 to get out of bed but R1 did not want to due to R1's physical condition.
After the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be unsubstantiated.
Regarding the allegation of- due to lack of supervision, resident went into another resident's room during the night, the reporting party stated that resident #3 (R3) enter R1's room at night, covering R1 with a blanket which resulted R1 being scared and panicking.
As part of the investigation, LPA interviewed R1, R2, and S1.
According to S1, when the incident happened, R1 and R3 were roommates so R3 did not enter another resident's room and R3 thought R1 was cold so R3 walked over to R1’s bed and covered R1 with a blanket. S1 stated that after the incident, they moved R3 to another room and there were no further incidents.
According to R1, S1 was present when it happened and S1 redirected R3 to another room. R1 stated that he/she was scared but it did not happen again after R3 was transferred to another room.
According to R2, R3 never entered his/her room and there were always staff members at the facility.
After the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be unsubstantiated.
Although the above investigations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Report was discussed with caregiver and the administrator who was on the phone.
A copy of the report was provided.
|