1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | staff interviewed stated S1 speaks to residents in a “terrible” way, and stated S1 made two residents cry by being “mean.” The resident stated S1 was mean and used a mean tone towards them, and the resident referred to S1 using a disparaging name.
Two residents indicated their dislike for S1 and both ordered S1 out of their rooms on different occasions. One resident interviewed stated S1 treated them kindly, but they had heard from other residents that they were not happy with S1, and they did not appreciate the way S1 talked down to them. One resident interviewed stated Staff 2 (S2) wanted them to put lipstick on, but the resident declined. S2 then grabbed the resident’s chin and held it and applied the lipstick. The resident reported this behavior to S1, and stated after that S2 was no longer at the facility. This resident indicated their interactions with S1 were okay, but stated other residents and staff complained about S1.
Responsible parties interviewed stated they thought S1 was “rude.” One example provided was a responsible party told S1 they would be late paying the monthly rate by 7 days, and S1 responded “What if I don’t feed [the resident] for 7 days?” A responsible party stated their family member cried every day over the treatment from S1. Another responsible party stated S1 interrupted a private conversation they were having with the resident they were visiting, and called it “disrespectful.” A responsible party stated another family member stated they felt “intimidated” into not visiting a resident.
Residents were not accorded dignity in their relationships with staff, residents, and other persons when S1 used a “rude” and “mean” tone towards residents and their responsible parties, spoke down to residents, and ordered residents to go to bed. Residents were not free from humiliation or intimidation when S2 grabbed a resident’s face and put on lipstick after the resident declined. Both S1 and S2 are no longer employed at the facility. Based on the information obtained, the allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time.
Pursuant to Title 22, California Code of Regulations, the following deficiency is cited (refer to LIC 9099-D).
Exit interview conducted. Copy of report and Appeal Rights issued via email.
|