1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Administrator admitted they were unable to conduct the reappraisal before the resident moved out, although there were two weeks between the diagnosis and the resident moving out. Therefore the allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time.
On the allegation: Staff did not follow physician's orders for resident's meals. It was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) had a special diet to have food cut up by staff due to poor hand functioning, but this did not happen and therefore R1 could not eat. According to multiple responsible parties interviewed, staff did not follow special diets for residents who required food to be chopped, resulting in residents not eating. Per R1’s responsible party, R1 lost a significant amount of weight, of about 50lbs in one year. R1’s reappraisal on 6/29/2020 states they are independent with dining assistance and has a regular diet (no special diet). The reappraisal was signed by the resident on 6/29/2020. Weight records for the facility indicate R1 weighted 197 lbs on 6/1/2019, 197 lbs on 12/28/2019, 184 lbs on 6/29/2020, R1’s physician’s report dated 8/4/2020 indicates R1 weighed 178 lbs, and facility weight records show 185 lbs on 3/12/2021. LPA was unable to verify that the resident lost a large amount of weight (the 50 lbs that was alleged). R1’s updated physician’s report dated 3/22/2021 indicates R1 had a special diet “unable to cut own food or open juice boxes.” R1 moved out of the facility on 4/5/2021. Administrator Stephanie Radu admitted they facility did not conduct a reappraisal of R1 before R1 moved out, therefore the new order for cut food was not implemented. Based on the information obtained, the allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time.
Deficiencies cited on 9099-D, report and appeal rights issued via certified mail.
|