1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 05/20/2021, Investigator Santana conducted an interview with R1’s representative and Witness #1 (W1); on 05/24/2021, with R1’s primary care physician; and from 06/03/2021 to 06/04/2021, with facility staff, Administrator and Assistant Administrator.
Investigator Santana reviewed copies of facility records and medical records related to R1. The information indicated R1 was admitted to the facility on 02/23/2021. The physician report, dated 01/26/2021, listed the primary diagnosis as late onset Alzheimer’s disease with behavioral disturbance, and secondary diagnoses of multifactorial gait disorder and physical deconditioning. R1 was noted as being confused and unable to following instructions, and having inappropriate, aggressive, and wandering behaviors. R1 required assistance with transferring and ambulating. R1 had a history of hip fracture and arthritis. Additionally, the Investigator reviewed the Unusual Incident Report for the 04/14/2021 fall, progress notes, 24-hour shift reports, and photos of R1’s injured arm.
On 04/14/2021, at approximately 8:00pm, R1 resisted the assistance of two caregivers, Staff #1 (S1) and Staff #2 (S2), with being placed in bed, and insisted they leave R1’s bedroom. At approximately 8:30pm, staff heard the floor mat alarm and found R1 on the floor by bed. S1 and S2 helped R1 off the floor and into bed. R1 was uncooperative, yelled and denied pain. No injuries were noted at the time.
According to Investigator Santana, there appears to be an element of neglect in that caregivers did not know how to adequately address R1’s aggression, which may have been the root cause of the fall, but R1 was a known fall risk and was liable to fall at any time despite facility fall precautions. Based on the information obtained, there is not sufficient evidence to support the allegation, therefore the allegation Facility Resident #1 (R1) sustained a fractured shoulder as a result of facility neglect/lack of supervision is deemed unsubstantiated at this time.
Between 8/26/21 through 10/1/21, LPA Luong interviewed staff and residents' responsible party over the telephone. On 4/4/22, LPA Luong interviewed residents at the facility. Interviews conducted during that time did not reveal that staff had made inappropriate towards residents. However, interviews does reveal that the demeanor of Administrator Prager was blunt and not tactful in some instances where staff felt that interpersonal skill could be improved on. Based on interviews, staff made inappropriate comments is unsubstantiated at this time.
Exit interview conducted, appeal rights and a copy of this report issued. |