1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Staff interviews revealed they did not believe resident’s falls were sustained as a result of neglect or lack of supervision. Residents interviewed stated their needs were met by staff. LPA Olson interviewed staff, administrator, and reviewed incident reports. LPA determined after incident report review and interviews, that the falls sustained were not as a result of lack of supervision. Administrator interview revealed the facility reviewed each resident with multiple falls to try to determine a root-cause of the falls. The number of falls have significantly decreased in the last year since implementing this procedure. In many of the cases reviewed, the falls were due to resident health issues versus a lack of supervision, as it was determined supervision was not needed for walking. Based on the information obtained, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.
On the allegation: Facility is insufficiently staffed to meet the care and needs of residents.
LPA reviewed staff schedules, interviewed residents, and interviewed staff and administrator.
All residents interviewed indicated their care needs were met by staff. Staff interviewed indicated they could use more staff at the facility, but in the meantime staff ensured residents’ needs were met through teamwork and by working overtime. In addition to the med tech and caregiver listed on the schedule, the Administrator, nurse, and memory care director step in to provide direct care assistance or medication assistance as needed. Administrator stated they was in the process of hiring and onboarding new staff, and they were having former staff return. Administrator stated they were conscious of staff working too much and could get burned out, so was prioritizing hiring additional staff. LPA requests that the master schedule be updated to show the additional care coverage provided on each shift by management staff. Due to insufficient evidence, the allegation could not be proven at this time. Therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.
On the allegation: Staff are not responding to residents call button in a timely manner.
All residents interviewed indicated their needs were met, and staff respond to their call buttons in a timely manner. LPA tested a call button and observed the response time to be 9 minutes. Staff interviewed stated they always respond as quickly as they can to call buttons, and the maximum response time they aim for is 5-10 minutes. LPA reviewed call button logs and observed the response times were mostly less than 10 minutes for the entire month reviewed. Administrator stated management routinely reviews the call button response time log to ensure response times are appropriate, and to look for trends.
Continued on 9099-C |