1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | door, once in the home the RP address C1 by stating, “I’m sorry, you’re in the wrong house.” RP stated that they had to grab a hold of C1 to walk them out of the RP’s home. Once past the door of the RP’s home with C1, the RP walked across the street and notified staff of the facility that the client had entered their home without any staff present and was still in their front yard. Once the RP notified staff at the facility that C1 had entered the RP’s home staff then walked across the street to redirect C1. The RP contact Santa Barbara County Sheriffs. RP provided video evidence of C1 walking up the RP’s driveway at 10:27am. C1 was not wearing any shoes, moving at a slow pace with irregular gate (limping) and not accompanied by any staff, nor were their staff in the background of the video which faces towards the facility. Staff Only arrived after C1 walked from the back yard of the facility, across the street, up the driveway, into the Rp’s home, then redirected C1 of the RP’s home, walked down the driveway, across the street and notified the staff that C1 was still on RP’s property. Due to the slow pace of C1 from the backyard of the facility, across the street, up the driveway and into the neighbors home, the neighbor redirecting the C1 out of the home, then walking across the street to notify staff, then staff moving across the street to redirect C1 constitutes a significant amount of time that C1 was not supervised by staff resulting in a temporary elopement, therefore the allegation of, “Lack of supervision resulting in resident wandering away from the facility” is substantiated at this time.
Exit interview, citations issued, report signed, appeal rights provided, and copy of report provided. |