1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Based on LPAs record review and interview, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6 & Chapter 1, Article 06. Continuing Requirements 80065 Personnel Requirements), is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
Allegation #2
Facility did not provide services to meet clients' mental health needs.
Between 9:40 a.m. and 2:30 p.m., LPA reviewed staff records and interviewed administrator. Interview with administrator at 2:30 p.m., reveals that there was no Licensed Marriage Family Therapist (LMFT) services provided in the November and December 2021, administrator will be appealing as hours provided by LMFT and Behavior Consultants were not documented, and administrator was informed at 3:40 p.m. by a previous staff that services as contracted. The facility’s plan of operation to meet client’s mental health needs require 4 hours of qualified behavior consultant and 1 hour of LMFT per client each month. Record reviews corroborated administrator’s 2:30 p.m. statement. In addition, in the month of October, 4 out of 4 clients received 1.5 hours with a behavior consultant per LPA record review.
Based on LPAs record review and interview, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6 & Chapter 6, Article 06. Continuing Requirements 85075 Health-Related Services), is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
Allegation #3
Facility transport vehicle was not kept clean
Between 9:40 a.m. and 2:30 p.m., LPA conducted interviews with staff and clients. Interviews with staff reveals that the facility van has not been cleaned and smells of urine. Seats were made from cloth fabric and will absorb smells. Clients may become incontinent during transportation. LPA and administrator inspected the vehicle at 1:40 p.m., administrator stated, “It’s dirty.” LPA asked how the vehicle smelled, and administrator peaked his head inside the vehicle and removed his mask. Administrator was able to identify the smell of urine. LPA observed various light brown marks on the seats about the size of a thumb print. The carpet had various coloration of dark stains. Interviews with other staff reveals that some staff have been able to take the vehicle to a self-service carwash to perform cleaning, detailing, and shampooing of the vehicle, but no receipt of this would be available at the facility. (Continued on 9099C) |