1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | RP suspected that S6 was sexually abusing C1. S6 has a unisex name, and RP assumed S6 was a male but S6 was a female. S5 provided the phone to S6 to speak to the RP. RP did not believe that the person on the line was S6. RP also reported the incident to the sheriffs. LPA reviewed email correspondence from Tri-Counties Regional Center Quality Assurance Specialist (TCRCQA) Figueroa and LPA Jeffries. TCRCQA spoke to Deputy Peters from the Santa Barbara County Sheriff’s office on the evening of 6/22/2020 and reported that Deputy Peters said, “are not anticipating sending the complaint to the DA’s office as there was no proof of criminal activity other than RP’s suspicion someone was in C1’s room at the time of the Echo “drop in.””
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
Exit interview conducted and this report was emailed to the facility administrator. |