1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | facility provided R1’s recent history, physician’s reports, medication list, and advanced healthcare directive. However, the facility did not give a complete copy of R1’s records to their responsible party as requested. Based on the information obtained, the allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time.
On the allegations: Staff did not ensure resident’s room was kept in clean sanitary conditions, and Staff did not ensure resident’s room was free of mal odors. LPA reviewed photographs obtained by Resident 1’s (R1’s) responsible party (RP). RP stated when RP visited R1 in R1’s room on 12/31/2023, feces were observed on the wall of R1’s room. RP indicated R1 had a behavior of throwing their brief at the wall. LPA observed photographs of numerous brown marks all over a wall but did not observe any during the visit on 5/21/2024. RP stated feces was observed in R1’s room on 12/31/2024 which caused a mal odor in the room. RP stated they conducted a walk through with now former Administrator on 4/23/2024 at which time RP observed the feces on the wall was “dried and still present” and stated the feces seemed to be dry enough to not present a mal odor. During the visit on 5/21/2024, LPA toured the “Compass Rose” memory care unit of the facility with Staff 1 (S1). At approximately 2:00 pm, LPA observed a mal odor in the common area of the memory care unit, of urine and feces. LPA brought the odor to S1’s attention, and S1 stated “I smell it too.” Based on interview conducted and documents obtained, the allegation that Staff did not ensure resident’s room was kept in clean sanitary conditions is deemed Substantiated at this time.
On the allegation, facility staff did not safeguard resident’s personal belongings, RP stated R1 had many personal belongings such as but not limited to scarves, clothing, sheets, bedspread, a doll, and pillows. RP noted one scarf that was missing was worn by a staff member, who stated a resident gave them the scarf. RP further stated when R1’s coats, jackets, and other clothing articles were returned from being laundered, many of the items had been “ruined” due to having been put through a washer and/or dryer when they were not the type of fabrics that should have been washed and/or dried. RP provided email communications between facility staff and RP inquiring about missing and damaged items. RP also noted when R1 was moving out, RP discovered several items in R1’s room that did not belong to R1. During the visit on 5/21/2024, LPA conducted interviews with residents. Resident 2 (R2) stated their clothing and laundered items were not returned after several days. Resident 3 (R3) stated personal clothing items such as shirts were either being washed in too hot of water or dried at too hot of a temperature because the shirts are getting “shorter and shorter”. R3 also stated a furniture item was damaged when facility staff moved R3 into a different room. During today’s visit, LPA conducted an interview with R3’s Responsible Party. R3’s
Please continue to 9099-C, Pg 3. |