1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | At 12:34 p.m. on 2/10/26, LPA reviewed five discharged client files and identified one client with documented dietary restrictions. Interviews with the Administrator revealed that staff frequently communicated with Patients’ Rights due to the client’s ongoing concerns about food items. Documentation showed that staff made multiple efforts to accommodate the client, including preparing modified meals, labeling gluten free options, providing additional fruits, and purchasing alternative items. Staff also provided photos of meals prepared for the client. Staff reported the client made frequent and highly specific requests that changed daily.
Between 3/13/26 and 3/20/26, LPA interviewed facility staff regarding procedures used to identify and follow dietary restrictions. Staff reported that a dietary/allergy list is posted in the kitchen, on teams for the client’s profiles, and in their medical file and that restrictions are typically identified during pre-assessment, intake and/or noted in the Physicians Report (LIC 602A). Staff stated they separate plates as needed and that clients may exercise personal choice in what they eat. Staff did not recall any instances of food allergy concerns or clients being denied foods consistent with their restrictions.
Clients interviewed stated they have had no issue with food quality, quantity, or options. Current clients do not have dietary restrictions, except for a client with an allergy.
LPA also noted that on 12/18/25, the Administrator emailed documentation showing steps taken to accommodate a client with dietary concerns. During visit on 3/20/26 LPA observed staff with hair net, and gloves preparing food. The current dietary restrictions list was updated in the kitchen.
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility maintains procedures for identifying and accommodating dietary restrictions. Dietary/allergy information is documented and updated in client records and posted in the kitchen for staff awareness. At this time, there is not a preponderance of evidence to determine that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Continued on 9099-C page3 |