1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA Olson investigated the remaining allegations, obtained documentation, and interviewed staff and clients on 4/19/23.
On the allegation: Staff member sexually abused resident in care. It was alleged that Staff #1 (S1) made sexual advances toward Client #1 (C1). On 02/24/2023, at approximately 4:11pm, Investigator Santiago conducted an interview with the reporting party (RP); on 03/16/2023, from approximately 11:00am to 4:10pm, attempted interview with former Client #1 (C1), staff, clients, and Regional Director of Operations; on 03/17/2023, from approximately 9:00am to 11:15am, attempted interview with C1, staff, Clinical Director, and attempted interview with Staff #1 (S1); on 04/11/2023, from approximately 9:30am to 9:54am, left voicemail message for C1 and S1; on 04/17/2023, at approximately 8:30am, attempted interview with S1; on 04/28/2023, at approximately 8:00am, attempted interview with S1; on 05/01/2023, from approximately 10:30am to 1:55pm, with C1, Regional Director of Operations, and attempted interview with a former client who declined to be interviewed; on 05/05/2023, from approximately 9:15am to 9:45am, with Employee Relations Manager and S1. Additionally, Investigator Santiago reviewed facility file documents, text messages, and Santa Maria Police Department Report #SMPD23009523 relevant to the complaint.
According to the Physician Report, dated 08/29/2022, C1’s diagnosis included Major Depressive disorder, severe without psychotic feature. C1 was able to follow instructions, occasionally confused but able to communicate needs. A review of C1’s chart and admit notes revealed issues between C1 and clients, but the notes had no revelation of the relationship between C1 and S1. C1 was admitted to the facility on 07/15/2022, discharged 08/18/2022, and admitted again on 08/30/2022, discharged 09/29/2022.
Information obtained from Investigator Santiago’s interviews revealed C1 denied that they were sexually abused by S1 and stated that S1 “never” forced anything on them. C1 also denied that S1 inappropriately touched C1 or conducted an unwelcomed behavior. However, C1 indicated that they shared a kiss in S1’s office which was consensual on both parties. There were no witnesses to corroborate that the kiss happened between C1 and S1. C1 admitted that they never disclosed to any staff about sexual abuse by S1. None of the clients or staff have expressed concern or speculated that C1 and S1 had any form of relationship. S1 did not have a history of sexual abuse in their file, nor have any staff or clients expressed concerns about S1’s behavior. All the staff that were interviewed did not disclose that they saw any signs or indicators that there was a sexual relationship between C1 and S1. Client interviews also did not reveal that they were victims of sexual abuse by S1. Continued on 9099-C (pg 3) |