1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the malodorous yard, the complaint alleged that yard was malodorous due to a concrete dog run covered with feces and urine. It was reported that smell was present during day care hours. Upon inspection, LPA did not observe any unpleasant odor.
Interview with Licensee revealed that Animal Control had visited the home four (4) times to assess the condition of the dogs. Licensee stated that the inspection conducted by Animal Control Department did not find any evidence of dog maltreatment.
This investigation included LPAs' observation and interviews with parents, and interview with licensee, none of whom supported the above allegations.
Although the above allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations are Unsubstantiated.
Notice of Site Visit was issued and must posted for 30 days.
Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with Licensee, Elizabeth Silva-Medina.
It was translated in Spanish by Licensee's niece, Jennifer Silva-Medina.
|