| One parent interviewed stated, they have observed the facility under construction in 2024. The parent added, the construction pertained to Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) on top of the garage and to a patio cover in the FCCH. The additional parent interviewed stated, their chilld(ren) have only been enrolled at the FCCH for three months and the parent has not observed construction. Both parents who were interviewed stated they approve of the care and supervision the licensee provides to the children in care.
LPA reviewed documents. The first document pertained to fire inspection service request (STD850). The fire service request revealed the following: The fire inspector did not grant the FCCH capacity for a large license. The comments on the STD850 revealed there were concerns by the fire marshal’s due to construction and construction workers at the FCCH. On 5/19/2025 LPA received/reviewed a city application for a permit, the document states the above-mentioned FCCH address applied for a permit but was yet to be granted.
On 05/16/2025 LPA conducted a facility inspection LPA observed a ADU unit on top of the garage and LPA observed a incomplete patio cover under construction at the FCCH.
LPA also conducted license and city inspector interview. The licensee interviews revealed the facility was under construction though out 2024. The city inspector interview revealed the land lord applied for construction permits on three different construction projects in 2024(see LIC812).
Regarding allegation#2 Licensee did not report construction to licensing. LPA conducted a file review. LPA did not discover any document pertaining to licensee notifying the department of three different construction projects.
During licensee interview, license stated she informed the former assigned Licensing Program Analyst of construction taken place. However the former assigned LPA stated, no information or document pertaining to major construction was submitted to the department.
Based on LPA's observations, interviews during the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, Allegation #1 and #2 is SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, is being cited on the attached LIC-9099D.
Exit interview was conducted, report was read to Licensee Maria Espinoza (in Spanish). Appeal rights were provided to Licensee.
Notice of site visit was provided and must remain posted in a prominent publicly accessible area in the FCCH for 30 days.
|