1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Interviews conducted with Licensee revealed, how Licensee has not yelled or treated a child in a inappropriate manner. Licensee stated she practices patients with children and she has yet to observe a child in her care, that demonstrates challenging behavior. License stated, how Licensee allows all currently enrolled children's parent to enter the home.
As mentioned LPA conducted two unannounced visits. LPA observed during unannounced visits, Licensee speak to children in a calm manner. LPA has not observed Licensee exceed the limitations of her child care license.
Regarding allegation#2 Licensee spoke inappropriately to children in care, LPA conducted parent interviews. The interviews revealed, parents have not observed Licensee speak inappropriately to children in care.
LPA conducted a child (C#1)interview. The child interview revealed, C#1 has not observed or heard licensee speak to a child in a inappropriate manner.
Although the allegations may or may have occurred or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the violation did or did not occur. Therefore, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED
Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with Licensee Guadalupe Condado.
Appeal Rights were provided.
Notice of site visit was provided and must remain posted in a prominent publicly accessible area in the center for 30 days. |