1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 3 of 3
On 07/25/25 R1 was ready to be released from Valley Medical Center, after the altercation on 07/16/25, back to the facility. ADM informed W1 that R1 needed to be assessed before returning to the facility. ADM had several discussions with W1 regarding R1s capability to return to the facility and that the facility stated he/she needed a higher level of care. W1 stated that the resident was referred to the bronze team at valley medical to be placed back to the community or for placement. ADM stated that the Case Manager was informed that the facility has concerns for R1s safety and needs to have a new functional capability test and that the facility states resident needs a higher level of care. ADM was scheduled to visit R1 in the hospital prior to his/her discharge and when ADM called W1 to ask what the room number and floor R1 was on was informed not to come to reassess that Resident was revaluated discharge planning team with Social Worker and Doctors and CM decided resident needed higher level of care and resident was sent to a Skilled nursing Facility.
On 08/21/25 the facility ADM received a call from the Skilled Nursing Facility stating R1 was rehabilitated and can return to the facility. ADM informed W2 that R1 needed to be assessed prior to returning to the facility. ADM visited R1 at the Skilled Nursing Facility and stated to W1 that R1 needed a higher level of care. W1 stated that R1 was frequently reminded to use auditory device to be able to hear and continued to not wear his/her eyeglasses. ADM stated the facility believed that R1 would be safer at a facility that can provide higher level of care. W1 stated the R1 was placed at board and Care Home where resident is thriving.
On 10/14/25 the department concluded its investigation.
Based on investigation, interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the Department found that the above allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. An unsubstantiated finding indicates that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegations did or did not occur.
This report was reviewed with Administrator, Prunella Cardozo, and a copy of the report was provided. |