1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA’s investigation revealed that C1 has a 1:1 aide, (A1). Based on interviews, staff who witnessed the incident stated there was visual supervision on C1 at all times by facility staff and there was no Heimlich maneuver performed on C1. All staff interviewed stated C1 threw the candy up on the floor. A1 stated seeing C1 grab and eat a candy and attempted to run away then started choking on the candy. A1 stated not remembering the term “Heimlich maneuver” and explained what happened to the Director without using the term.
The Department has investigated and determined that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted. This report was discussed and left with the Licensee, Shuree Guzman, whose signature on this form confirm receipt of these documents.
A NOTICE OF SITE VISIT WAS ISSUED, POSTED NEAR THE ENTRANCE TO THE FACILITY, AND MUST REMAIN POSTED FOR 30 DAYS. |