1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Interviews reported that some staff speak Chinese, and not all staff are able to understand those conversations. The information also indicated that some staff may naturally speak in a loud voice, and use a loud voice when trying to stop children from hurting themselves or others which could be perceived as yelling. However, the available information was insufficient to determine whether children were yelled at in a manner that violated their personal rights. Interviews reported that the facility utilizes time out for disciplinary practices where they have a child sit in the chair and discuss their behavior with the teacher and how to improve their social interactions. As well as have the child calm their body down or reflect on their behavior either with a teacher or in a area where the teacher can still observe them. However, the available information was insufficient to determine whether the amount of time a child was sitting in a chair violated their personal rights.
Interviews conducted described staff having positive relationships with the children, and the information obtained did not reveal evidence that the alleged conduct occurred. Information gathered indicated that discipline practices include redirection with the child, talk with them at eye level, and send reports to parents if child continues to display inappropriate behaviors. Although the allegations included concerns that staff hit children, threatened children and used inappropriate discipline, the information obtained did not provide sufficient evidence to determine whether these incidents occurred.
The information gathered included inconsistencies, and it was not possible to determine whether any actions constituted a violation of children's personal rights. Additionally, there were varying accounts regarding staff's tone of voice and the manner in which children were handled while in care. Based on the available information, there was insufficient evidence to confirm or deny the allegations.
Based on the evidence gathered during the investigation, the Department determined that, although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
No deficiency was cited during today's investigation.
An exit interview was conducted, and this report was reviewed with Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Jia Yi. Notice of Site Visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. |