1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA conducted an audit of the centrally stored medication record and cross referenced when prescription was dispensed from the start date of medication. Based on audit the medication was not administered for a total of 3 days. S1 confirmed he/she did not administer medication for 3 days.
S2 stated he/she was not aware of the incidents when resident fell on 10/11/25. S2 stated he/she reports incidents to the department when an incident occurs. S2 stated that he/she was not aware of the new medication not being administered to R1. S2 stated that when a resident falls caregivers are instructed to call licensee, and licensee will inform S2 of the fall. S2 stated that residents are observed and checked for any injuries and then will call 911 if warranted. S2 stated the responsible party is informed of incident. Per S1
R1 had a fall 10/11/25 and licensee was informed and S2 stated he/she did not report it to Licensing because he/she was not aware.
The department completed its investigation and determined based on records review, interviews and observations there is preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did occur; therefore, the allegations are substantiated. See both allegations on 9099-D for deficiency cited per the California Code of Regulations, Title 22.
This report was reviewed with Marilou Bancud and a copy of report and appeals rights were provided. |