1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 09/12/2024, R1's medical records from the hospital visit notes that testing was completed, which did not show any blood clots. On 09/17/2024, during a follow-up visit with R1's doctor noted under the “history of present illness” section that R1 is here for a follow-up on a blood clot that was provoked by inactivity, sitting at the computer many hours during the day for days at a time.
Based on staff interview, 4 out of 4 staff members states that R1 participates in activities at the facility daily. Staff stated that R1 has the same routine every day after day program to include a variety of activities like dancing and walking around the facility daily. 4 out of 4 staff denied allowing R1 to watch movies all day and his/her laptop. Staff stated that prior to R1 going to the hospital, R1’s routine did not change. Staff stated that R1 continued to participate in activities daily to include exercise.
A witness (W2) was interviewed. Based on witness interview, it was stated that he/she knew how the facility staff worked and believed the staff would allow R1 to sit down all day to color and watch movies when he/she was not working. W2 stated that whenever he/she was working, he/she would need to remind the staff to play music for R1 so R1 can exercise.
The review of R1’s care plan states that R1 should maintain a walking regimen.
Based on interview with R1, it was stated he/she participates in activities at the facility to include exercise twice a day.
Based on review of R1’s medical records, it’s indicated that R1 has history of obesity and other health conditions which require the use of certain medications that may increase the risk factors of developing a blood clot, if the resident was active as staff and resident claims.
The Department has investigated the above allegation. Based on interview, record review and observation the above allegation is unsubstantiated. An unsubstantiated finding indicates that although the allegation may have happened and/or is valid there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. No deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulation, Title 22. This report was reviewed with Administrator, Audrey Ann Salvador and a copy of the report was provided. |