1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA Marrufo interviewed 7 Memory Care staff. All 7 out of 7 interviewed staff stated that staff usually clean bodily waste in a resident’s room in around 5 minutes. They all stated during interview that although housekeepers are not on duty from 5PM to 7 AM, CNAs and nurses at the facility during those hours will clean any bodily waste in a resident’s room. The staff stated that there is an emergency cleaning kit available to staff when the housekeepers are not available. LPA Marrufo observed the emergency cleaning kit near the kitchenette in the Memory Care Unit. The emergency cleaning kit contained cleaning sprays, a cleaning brush, and a cleaning bucket.
LPA Marrufo interviewed R1’s Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) #1, #2, and #3. DPOA #2 stated that R1 has a behavior of leaving bodily waste in R1’s living unit. DPOA #1 stated that there R1 has a private duty care aid who would be available to clean up any bodily waste in R1’s living unit. DPOA #2 stated there was an incident in which R1 had left bodily waste in R1’s living unit, and DPOA #3 wanted staff to clean the bodily waste immediately. However, the facility staff were serving lunch at the time and told DPOA #3 that they would clean the bodily waste after lunch because the staff did not want to handle bodily waste while serving lunch.
LPA Marrufo interview staff S1, who also stated that there was an incident when staff did not immediately clean R1’s bodily waste in R1’s living unit because lunch was being served at that time and staff did not want to handle bodily waste while serving lunch to residents.
During interview, DPOA #3 stated that there was bodily waste in R1’s living unit and no staff came to clean up the bodily waste.
LPA Marrufo reviewed R1’s medications, Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Physicians Order Report, which lists R1’s prescribed medications. After reviewing the medications and MAR, LPA did not find any medications that were not administered according to prescription orders.
Based on information from interviews conducted with staff, and records reviewed, although the allegations listed above may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated.
No Deficiencies cited under California Code of Regulations Title 22. This report was reviewed with Valerie Alves and a copy of the report was provided. Page 2 of 2. END REPORT. |