1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The review of facility records show that, R1 was marked in attendance to receive dinner which was served between 1730 and 1830 hours. Staff (S1) stated he/she remembered R1 picking up his/her medications around 1745 hours. Staff (S2) stated he/she remembered seeing R1 during snack time around 2015 hours.
Between 2015 to 2200 hours, R1 was unaccounted for because the facility did not start bed checks until after 2200 hours. R2 indicated that he/she told staff (S2) that R1 was in the bathroom during a room check at approximately 2200 hours.
S2 stated the observation of R1’s bathroom light turned on, and the appearance of R1's bathroom being occupied during S2’s room check at 2200 hours. S2 did not check if anyone was in the bathroom.
Around 0000 hours, S3 found R1 lying on the floor of the the bathroom. Staff immediately called 911.
Based on review of the police report records, R1's body was in rigor mortis by the time the officers arrived. According to ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, rigor mortis "appears approximately two hours after death in the muscles of the face, progresses to the limbs over the next few hours, completing between six to eight hours after death". R1 was pronounced deceased.
Based on staff interview, S1 believed S2 was not thorough with his/her bed check because S2 should have used common sense to knock on the bathroom door and look underneath the door frame if the staff did not see R1 in bed. S1 stated that if S2 had conducted a proper bed check, then staff could have given a Narcan or provided aid sooner.
The Department has investigated the above allegation. Based on record review, interview, and observation the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the above allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. A deficiency was cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. See LIC9099-D.
PAGE 2 OF 3. |