1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Based on review of the police report, 2 witnesses stated to have observed staff hit R1. Witness (W1) stated to have observed one of the staff swing at R1 but was not sure which of the staff hit R1. It was stated that the incident happened in front of the facility. Witness (W2) stated to have observed of the staff hit R1 multiple times to get into the facility.
Resident (R1) was interviewed. Based on interview, R1 denied staff pushing and hitting him/her. R1 did not have any complaints about staff’s treatment towards him/her.
The 2 staff members who were part of alleged incident were interviewed. Based on staff interview, 2 out of 2 staff denied pushing and hitting R1. Staff stated a moment while walking back to the facility where the staff was yelling at R1 to “stop” before crossing the crosswalk as there was a bus coming. Staff denied touching R1 while walking back to the facility and before entering the facility.
Based on review of the police report, on 01/23/2025, there were no bruises or marks on R1’s body. It was noted that R1 did not seem fearful of the staff. Based on LPA’s observation on 01/30/2025, there were no bruises or marks on R1’s body. R1 did not observe to seem fearful of the staff.
The Department has investigated the above allegation. Based on interview, record review and observation the above allegation is unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegation is valid there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
No deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. This report was reviewed with Licensee, Marie Pendar and a copy of the report was provided.
Page 2 of 2. |