1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA interviewed staff S2. S2 is a Spanish speaker. LPA used translation software to communicate with S2. S2 is a staff direct taking care of 3 clients including client C1. S2 did not observed anyone hitting C1 or any clients S2 knew and saw C1's bruise but did not know what happened to C1. C1 always locked self in the restroom for a while when C1 was using restroom. C1 hit and broke the faucet in the restroom last week.
Based on the review of C1's appraisal needs and service plan, C1 may resort to self injurious behavior.
Based on the review of the picture of C1's bruise on the chest, it cannot be excluded the possibility that the bruise caused by the seat belt.
Based on the review of incident reports sent to CCL office regarding C1, there is no incident report of R1 in February 2024, March 2024, April 2024, and May 2024.
Based on the interview and records reviewed, no evidence to indicate C1 was hit or was abused in the day program facility.
Based on investigation, interviews conducted and records reviewed , the Department found that the above allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. An unsubstantiated finding indicates that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegations did or did not occur.
No citations noted at today’s compliant investigation visit. Exit interview conducted with ADM. A copy of this report was provided to ADM.
Page 3 of 3. |