1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 04/28/2023, 2 witnesses (W1 – W2) were interviewed. W1 – W2 stated residents at the facility are treated “fine”. W1 – W2 stated they did not observe any staff were providing care in a rough manner during their visits to the facility.
Based on interview with the complainant, they described the suspected abuser by race, but the name and specific description was unknown. Based on observation, there was no indication the residents were being provided improper care by no observation of obvious bruising of the skin or indications of pain. The review of the Department’s records did not show any reports that may be relating to a resident sustaining an injury or being provided improper care at the facility.
On 04/28/2023, two witnesses (W1 – W2) were interviewed. Based on interview with W1, it’s alleged R1 is missing multiple clothing items. Based on record review, resident (R1) only had 5 items listed on their safeguard of personal property and valuables form. The items that were alleged missing were not part of the items that were safeguarded. The Department was also not provided specific descriptions of the items that are alleged missing but rather vague descriptions. Based on interview with W2, there are no concerns or issues regarding missing items of R2’s.
Based on record review, interview, and observation the Department has investigated the above allegations to be unsubstantiated. An unsubstantiated finding means although the allegation may have happened and/or is valid there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur.
No deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. This report was reviewed with Administrator Nobuhle Manyika and Designated Administrator, Cynthia Octabiano and a copy of the report was provided. |