1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 06/27/2023, 1 staff member was interviewed. Based on interview, R1’s responsible party verbally gave staff (S1) permission to purchase R1 a new mattress during a meeting involving the facility Administrator, R1’s responsible party, and two witnesses. S1 states the purchase of the mattress did not occur until a verbal agreement was stated with R1’s responsible party.
On 11/27/2023, 1 witness (W2) was interviewed. Based on interview, the conversation regarding the purchase of a new mattress for R1 was brought up at the end of a meeting between the facility Administrator, W2, day program staff, and R1’s responsible party. W2 states the conversation was really quick and W2 was unable to recall any objection or agreement regarding the facility Administrator purchasing a mattress for R1 using R1’s personal funds. It was stated the other witness during the meeting was also unable to recall the exact statements during the meeting.
Based on record review, the facility documented the purchase on R1’s P&I log. The mattress was returned by R1’s responsible party, which R1 was provided a partial refund.
The Department has investigated the above allegation. Based on interview, record review and observation the above allegation is unsubstantiated. An unsubstantiated finding indicates that although the allegation may have happened and/or is valid there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
No deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. No deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. This report was reviewed with Administrator, Kaitlyn Brownell over the telephone. ADM provided verbal consent to allow staff (S1) to sign the report. A copy of the report was provided during visit. |