1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 3 of 3.
On 7/24/2024, the Department conducted an interview with resident (R1). R1 stated R1 had concerns about residents coming into his/her room and stealing R1’s personal belongings and snacks. R1 started placing his personal items in the staff’s main office but R1’s snacks are still being stolen. Staff told R1 that they are not allowed to have any locks on the room doors.
On 7/24/2024, the Department conducted an interview with ADM. ADM stated Licensing prohibits locks and he offered R1 to place his/her valuables in the staff office if R1 was not going to be in the room.
On 8/16/2024, LPA Rai conducted interviews with 13 residents. 6 Out of 13 residents refused to answer questions and 7 out of 13 residents spoke with LPA Rai. 7 Out of 7 residents stated their personal belongs have not been stolen at the facility. 7 Out of 7 residents stated they have not heard or seen residents’ personal belongs are being stolen at the facility.
On 8/16/2024, LPA Rai conducted interviews with 2 out of 2 staff at the facility (S1-S2). 2 Out of 2 staff stated their personal belongs have not seen stolen at the facility. 2 Out of 2 residents stated they have not heard or seen resident’s personal belongs are being stolen at the facility. S1 stated resident R1 keeps he/her electronic items in the staff/office room while R1 is out of the facility for safekeeping. S1 stated R1 does not have an LIC 621 Client/Resident Personal Property and Valuables in the resident file. S1 stated they are not responsible for his electronic items, but they will keep the items safe that are place in the staff/office room.
On 8/16/2024, LPA Rai conducted interview with ADM. ADM stated the facility staff will report to the local law enforcement if they are aware if resident or residents are stealing at the facility. ADM stated incidents have occurred in the past and they have filed reports with the local law enforcement.
Based on the interviews conducted with clients and staff and based on observation and records review, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the above allegations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
No deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. This report was reviewed with Lead Staff, Elizabeth Espique and a copy of the report was provided. |