1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed that on October 18, 2020, staff (S1) witnessed staff (S2) slapping R1's legs while S1 and S2 were transferring R1 to bed. S1 reported the incident to staff (S3) who was off that day.
On October 21, 2020, upon S3's return to work, S3 reported the incident to facility management and an investigation was conducted by the facility's human resource (HR) department. S2 resigned from work prior to the conclusion of the investigation. LPA was unable to reach S2 for an interview. LPA interviewed S1 and S3. S1 stated S1 saw S2 hitting R1 with an open hand once on each leg while attempting to change R1's diapers. S1 stated the incident occurred in R1's private room and there were no other witnesses.
R1's spouse (F1) was informed of the incident on October 21, 2020 and F1 contacted R1's primary care physician (PCP) for a physical examination of R1. On October 23, 2020, R1's PCP conducted a physical examination of R1 and did not observe bruises on R1. PCP noted eczema on buttocks area and increased the dosage of R1's current medication for it. PCP notes did not identify cause of eczema.
R1's medical records were reviewed. Per R1's diagnoses, R1 has memory impairment and is not a good historian. R1 is also non-verbal. On February 11, 2021, LPA attempted to interview R1. R1 did not respond. LPA observed R1 awake, slightly reclined to a seated position in bed, and with no visible signs of injury on exposed skin. R1's clothes and bed linens were observed clean and in good repair.
LPA attempted to interview residents in the facility's Memory Care unit where R1 resides. 5 out of 5 residents were unable to respond to interview questions due to cognitive impairment. R1 does not have a room mate.
San Jose Police Department (SJPD) report #20-295-9514 was obtained and reviewed.
The Department has investigated the above allegations. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the Department found that the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. An unsubstantiated finding indicates that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegation did or did not occur.
Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was provided electronically for signature. |