1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed that R1 is under hospice care since 02/28/2021. R1's hospice care plan was reviewed. On 07/02/2021, visiting hospice nurse (H1) documented that R1 is getting weaker, has difficulty feeding self, has not been getting up for meals, has decreased appetite, taking only 20% of meals, and only eats once a day. H1 also noted that a private caregiver may be needed when R1 can't feed self anymore.
On 07/09/2021, R1 was interviewed. R1 stated that R1 has no trouble feeding at this time and R1 will ask for help if R1 needs assistance. R1 stated staff has been responsive and nobody has refused to help R1. R1 demonstrated knowledge of activating R1's pendant alarm. On 07/29/2021, an unannounced facility visit was conducted and R1 stated R1 is able to feed self and demonstrated ability to activate pendant alert at 10:48 AM. Staff responded at 10:52 AM. R1 stated R1 had breakfast already.
Staff were interviewed. 4 out of 4 staff who were interviewed stated there is no facility policy regarding not assisting hospice residents with feeding. 2 out of 4 staff who were interviewed stated they have personally assisted R1 with feeding. 3 out of 4 staff stated R1 is still able to feed self, but very slowly. Staff stated R1 may not be able to feed self in the future and the care plan will be updated accordingly.
On 07/09/2021, Executive Director (ED) stated that the facility has a policy that assistance with feeding is done in the residents' private apartments only. Assistance with feeding is not allowed in the communal dining room to protect residents' dignity and residents and family members understand the policy. ED stated that if a resident needs assistance with feeding, room service will be provided.
LPA attempted to reach R1's responsible party on 07/01/2021, 07/09/2021, and 07/28/2021 but was unable to receive a response.
The Department has investigated the above allegation. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the Department found that the above allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. An unsubstantiated finding indicates that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegation did or did not occur.
Exit interview conducted with HWD. A copy of this report was provided during visit. |