1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding allegation “staff did not respond to residents alerts in a timely manner,” 4 out of 5 residents denied staff not responding to residents’ alerts in a timely manner. 10 out of 10 staff denied not responding to residents’ alerts in a timely manner. 10 out of 10 staff also denied seeing other staff not responding to residents’ alerts in a timely manner.
Regarding allegation “facility staff did not meet resident's toileting needs in a timely manner,” 4 out of 5 residents denied staff not meeting resident's toileting needs in a timely manner. 10 out of 10 staff denied not meeting residents’ toileting needs in a timely manner. 10 out of 10 staff also denied seeing other staff not meeting residents’ toileting needs in a timely manner.
Based on record review, the pendant response log revealed that there was no over an hour response time as alleged.
Between 02/14/2020 and 05/19/2020, the Department investigated an unrelated complaint that was similar to this complaint’s allegations. LPAs Gladys Kuizon and Jackie Jin interviewed 12 residents and 13 staff.
12 out of 12 residents stated their calls were being responded and their needs were being met. 13 out of 13 staff stated that staff responded to residents' calls and they believed that all the residents' needs were being met by staff.
Based on interviews and record review, the Department has determined that the allegations were UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur.
This report was reviewed with Executive Director and a copy of this report was provided. |