1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Insufficient caregiving assistance to residents are not being met:
On March 4, 2022, the Department interviewed Ms. Xiuyan Chen (S1). S1 stated he/she had 3 staff including himself/herself who provided care and supervision to residents. S1 also stated that he/she resides at the facility. S1 stated that he/she was looking into hiring additional staff.
On May 24, 2023, the Department conducted a follow-up interview with S1. S1 stated when Santa Clara County employees visited the facility on February 15 2022, S1 was the only staff present at the facility and no one else was scheduled to work at the facility. S1 stated that the facility has 2 staff who worked 2-3 days a week aside from S1. S1 stated, “I was trying my best to find caregiver. It was very difficult because I was working at another care home and working at my clinic at the same time.”
On May 25, 2023, the Department conducted a phone interview with the Licensee Madeline Chow (MC). MC stated he/she no longer overseeing the facility since October 2021. MC stated that he/she used to have 5 staff including him/her, his/her spouse and 3 other staff. MC stated that when he/she was managing the facility, there were no issues with staffing. MC stated that they were meeting the needs of residents until October 2021. MC stated that he/she did not know how many staff were working for S1 after October 2021. MC stated that retained his/her former 2 staff. MC stated that ADM informed him/her that S1 would remove R1 from resident’s roster because R1 will be designated staff.
Based on review of the facility staff roster, the document showed S1 and two staff (S2, S3) worked for the facility to provide care and supervision to resident, which included responsibilities but not limited to cleaning the facility and cooking resident meals 3 times a day.
The Department found that the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. An unsubstantiated finding indicates that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegation did or did not occur.
No citations noted at today’s compliant investigation visit. Exit interview conducted with Licensee. A copy of this report was provided to Licensee.
Page 3 of 3.
|