1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Between 07/13/2020-08/06/2020 LPA contacted facility administrator at 10:51am, 10:56am, and 7:04pm. Facility administrator responded to LPA’s calls and returned call when a voicemail was left.
Allegation: Facility is not dispensing the resident’s medication as prescribed
On 06/25/2020 S1 was interviewed and stated on 06/11/2020 there was a doctor’s order to increase prescription medication to 100mg, however, the doctor’s order was not sent to the doctor or to the pharmacy by the hospice nurse. S1 followed up with the hospice nurse on 06/16/2020, and new order for prescription medication was sent to the pharmacy. The facility received R1’s medication on the same day and started the medication.
3 out of 6 residents stated staff monitors their medications. Three residents stated they did not take medications at the facility.
On 08/28/2020 LPA Jackie Jin conducted a medication audit via FaceTime with Administrator. Based on observation of medication audit, LPA is not able to determine if facility followed doctor's order when giving medication. Administrator did not indicate or recall start dates of medications. LPA is unable to determine how many pills were left in for each medication based on the quantity of medication prescribed and how long the residents were taking their medications.
Doctor’s order for prescription medication was reviewed and it indicated that on 06/11/2020 prescription medication 100mg was ordered. Per Administrator, there was mis-communication between the hospice agency and the doctor’s order for prescription medication 100mg and a new doctor’s order was completed on 06/16/2020. Medication packing slip shows prescription medication 100mg was dispensed on 06/16/2020. Medication Administration Records (MAR) indicated that R1 began to take prescription medication 100mg on 06/16/2020 and was given daily at bedtime. MAR did not indicate any refusal of this medication.
This Department has investigated the above allegations, and based on interviews, records review, and observations the Department has determined that the allegations were Unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. This report was reviewed with Biao Zhang a copy of this report provided.
Page 3 of 3 |