1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The Department reviewed 3 incident reports for the residents R1-R3. The Department reviewed 3 incident reports for the residents R1-R3. The incident report stated, on May 6, 2025, around 3pm, ADM met with service coordinator (SC). SC mentioned that he/she noticed R1 was harassed by two individuals in the home. One hugged him/her and forced him/her to kiss in the mouth, while another individual grabbed him by his/her privates and kissed him/her in the mouth. Staff meeting was held immediately, and staff recalled the incident. Staff stated it happened so fast but tried to intervene by saying “no,no,no”, while another staff tried to intervene by saying, “don’t do that”.
The Department reviewed R2’s appraisal/Needs and Services Plan (ANS), dated April 1, 2025. The ANS states R2 has the following needs: Needs to be able to interact positively with other, Needs to express emotions/feelings appropriately.
The Department reviewed R3’s Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan (ANS) dated April 1, 2025. The ANS states R3 has the following needs: Needs to engage in group interaction and improve interpersonal relationships with peers, needs to express emotions/feelings appropriately.
The Department reviewed a special incident report dated June 18, 2025. The report states on May 6, 2025, it was observed that when in R2’s room, R2 initiated a hug with R1. While hugging R2 grabbed R1 by the chin and forced R1 into a kiss. A Witness intervened.
Based on a review of the investigation conducted; 4 Out of 5 staff interviewed (S1, S3-S5) stated residents R2 and & R3 behavior of kissing was a known behavior that has occurred in the past before the incident that occurred on May 6, 2025. Based on a review, Residents R2 and R3’s ANS does not detail how the facility address these behaviors, which resulted in R2 and R3 sexual abusing another resident
Based on interviews and documents review the preponderance of evidence standard has been met therefore the above allegations is found to be SUBSTANTIATED.
Deficiencies were cited from California Code of Regulations, Title 22 during today’s visit, see LIC 9099-D. This report was reviewed with Administrator Mary Grace Lazaro via phone call. ADM stated staff Golda Medinte could sign on her behalf. A copy of the report was provided. Appeal Rights was provided.
Page 4 Out of 4. END OF REPORT. |