1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Based on interview, staff (S1) witnessed R1’s fall. S1 was wheeling R1 out of the shower room, when R1 grabbed onto the door frame and pulled themselves forward falling headfirst. S1 states to have never left R1 alone and was in proximity. S1 states to try grabbing onto R1’s shoulder to lean it back but was unable to react quickly enough to prevent the fall. S1 was aware of their procedures for a two-person assist for transfers, however, S1 believed showers and transporting from one room to another was a one-person assist. S1 states another staff helped transfer the resident to the wheelchair to shower.
2 staff were interviewed. 2 out of 2 staff believe the incident was not due to lack of supervision. 2 out of 2 staff state R1 requires a two-person assist for transfers to and from the wheelchair.
Based on record review, R1’s signed service agreement only states a one-person assist for bathing. Other services such as dressing, grooming, and toileting only notes as “req assist” with no specific number of caregivers. R1 is a fall risk, and the facility notes actions to help reduce the risk of falls.
The Department has investigated the above allegations. Based on interview and record review, the Department has determined that the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. An unsubstantiated finding indicates that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur.
No deficiencies are being cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. This report was reviewed with Executive Director (ED), Jairus “Jett” Cabuena and a copy of the report was provided. |