1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Facility staff encourage R1 to use the walker on a regular basis and to ask for assistance, but R1 did not ask for assistance and attempted to do what R1 wanted without assistance.
An interview with R1's responsible party (RP) / health care agent was aware of R1's neurocognitive disorder and its symptoms. RP stated R1 was reassessed on 04/11/2021 wherein R1 was identified as a fall risk. R1's plan of care was that staff will provide occasional reminders and cueing due to memory loss. Staff were expected to observe for proper footwear and assure pathways are clutter free, items of necessity are within reach with adequate lighting, and frequent status checks of R1. R1 was encouraged to request assistance when needed, and to use walker at-all-times.
Due to R1's neurocognitive disorder, the department was unable to obtain any information from R1.
Staff failed to seek medical attention for resident in a timely manner.
Alleged that the facility staff did not take R1 to the hospital when R1 had complained of pain after a fall in May 2021. R1 was evaluated by Staff (S1), a non-medical professional. R1 was taken to the hospital four days after R1's fall because R1's health care agent did not want to send R1 to the hospital.
An interview with R1's responsible party (RP) stated awareness of R1's fall. RP stated that due to R1's neurocognitive disorder, R1 has lost the ability to articulate and therefore cannot express possible pain. RP stated that R1 did not complain of pain in between his fall on 05/06/2021 and the day R1 went to the hospital on 05/09/2021.
Staff (S1) was interviewed who assessed R1. S1 stated that on 05/06/2021, R1 told S1 that R1 had fallen and gotten up without assistance. R1 denied any pain and hitting head. R1 was assessed for injuries and observed a cut on right elbow wherein it was cleaned and bandaged. R1's vital signs were taken within normal limits.
Page 2 of 3. |