1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During the visit, LPAs interviewed Executive Director/Administrator (ED/ADM), residents (R1 and R2), and staff (S1 to S4). ED/ADM stated that R1 did complain about the loud TV volume coming from R2's bedroom.
ED/ADM stated R1's was complaint about R2's TV volume was addressed, a memo was sent to all residents stating the quiet time so everyone can rest, the memo states “To ensure that this environment is maintained, we request that all residents monitor the volume of their televisions and radios…TVs must be turned to lower volume around 10:00 p.m. or turned off around bedtime.”
In addition to the memo, ED/ADM installed acoustic panels on both sides of shared walls and suggested to R1 if he/she is willing to move to another apartment, but R1 refused. ED/ADM asked R2 to lower down the TV volume and made suggestions to R2 to use a headset. R2 refused to utilize a headset. ED/ADM asked R2’s if instead R2 is willing to move the TV to a different area in R2s apartment. R2 stated “yes.” ED/ADM instructed R1 to alert staff if R2's TV volume becomes loud during sleeping hours if needed.
Interviews with staff stated that after installation of the acoustic insulation panels on both walls, they could not hear noise from R2's bedroom but R1 continued to complain that a noise can still be heard from R2's apartment. Staff stated that none of the residents complained about loud TV noise from R2's bedroom.
Staff check on R2's bedroom when R1 alerts them about loud noise from R2's bedroom but when checked either R2 was not in his/her bedroom or TV was not in use, or volume level was at 20.
Based on observation and interviews, the facility made efforts to eliminate every possibility of noise reduction from R2's bedroom to R1's bedroom. No other residents complained of noise from R2's bedroom.
The Department has investigated the above allegations. Based on the interviews conducted with residents and staff, observations and documents reviewed, the allegations were UNFOUNDED. Meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or are without reasonable basis.
No deficiencies cited. This report was reviewed with MD and a copy of this report was provided MD.
Page 2 of 2. |