1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Based on a review of facility incident report (IR), dated May 29, 2023, R1 at approximately 11:50, was in his/her bedroom. R1 began to engage in private time. Staff proceeded to give R1 privacy in his/her bedroom. At Approximately 12:00, the facility got a knock on the door from neighbors, accompanied by R1. The IR stated the neighbors communicated that R1 trespassed on their property and that they contacted 911. Neighbors stated they wanted to make sure R1 was home safe.
Based on a review of R1’s Individual Program Plan (IPP), dated June 13, 2022, under safety skills/disaster preparedness: “R1 has very limited safety skills and requires constant supervision…R1 does not have street safety or stranger danger skills…if he sees something that is interesting to him/her, he/she may wander off to explore.” R1’s IPP also states on page 13, “Staff will provide care and supervision of behaviorally related events and provide redirection…”
Based on a review of R1’s Physician’s Report, dated June 13, 2023, resident R1 cannot leave the facility unassisted.
The Department has investigated the above allegation. Based on records reviewed, and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, the Department found the above allegation to be SUBSTANTIATED.
As a result, the Department issued an immediate civil penalty of $500 for a violation of absence of supervision, which resulted in R1 eloping from the facility.
Deficiencies were cited from California Code of Regulations, Title 22 during today’s visit, see LIC 9099-D. This report was reviewed with Administrator Noel Huante, via phone call. ADM stated her lead staff, Jeanette Aguilar could sign on her behalf. A copy of the report was provided. Appeal Rights was provided.
Page 3 Out of 3. |