1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 3 of 3.
Staff do not ensure there is enough food supplies at the facility for residents in care.
It was alleged that the facility did not have enough food supply to cook meals for the residents.
On 11/29/2023, the Department interviewed the Culinary Director who oversees the food service. CD stated there are changes that are made on the meals served to the residents based on what is delivered to facility by the food vendor. CD stated once the staff accounts for the delivery, they are able to make changes to the menu and notify the residents of the change. CD stated the facility will always have 2 days of perishable food supplies and 7 days of nonperishable food supplies and 3 days of emergency food and water supply.
On 11/29/2023, LPAs observed the food supply in the pantry, freezer, fridge, and kitchen. LPAs observed 2 days of perishable foods, 7 days of nonperishable foods and 3 days of emergency food and water supply.
On 12/19/2023, the Department interviewed 8 residents. 7 out of 8 resident state the facility did have enough food supply to cook meals for the residents. Resident (R1) stated the facility did not have enough food supply since the resident was not able to order the special of the day, but the facility did provide a meal off of the standby menu while is always available for the resident.
On 4/18/2024, the Department interviewed 11 residents. 1 resident cooked their own meal and did not have facility provide meals to him/her. 2 residents declined to make comments about the food supply at the facility. 8 out of the 11 residents stated the facility did have enough food supply at the facility. 8 residents stated they were served their entrée during breakfast, lunch and dinner and facility had provided snacks in the dinning room at all times.
Based on the interviews conducted with clients and staff and based on observation and records review, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the above allegations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
No deficiencies were cited at this time as per California Code of Regulations Title 22. This report was reviewed with Administrator, Gregory Becker and a copy of this report was provided. |