1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The review of R1’s account ledger shows that R1’s level of care cost increased from $1,325 to $2,450 in March 2024. This new level of care cost was carried through until May 2024. In June 2024, R1's care cost decreased to $1,950.
On 05/29/2024, 3 staff members were interviewed. Based on staff interview, it was stated that because R1’s assessment was at the 6 month time-frame, a re-assessment was completed due to that reason and not because R1 needed a different level of care or there was a change in condition. The review of R1’s service plan dated 05/14/2024, shows that R1’s level of care decreased from a care level 5 (05/20/2023) to a care level 3 (05/14/2024). The facility was unable to produce documentation to reflect an updated care plan showing the care increase between February 2024 – March 2024.
Based on interview with staff (S4), the level of care cost is reflected from the assessments which are discussed with the resident’s authorized representative and director in memory care. If a resident’s level of care is being increased, S4 would mail a letter to the resident’s POA regarding the notice of the increased level of care cost.
Based on the admission agreement between the facility and R1, it stated that upon a change in the care needs that will result in increase points the facility will provide a written notice to the resident or representative, if any, within two business days of providing service at the new level of care that results in a rate increase. It states that the notice will include a detailed explanation of the additional services provided and charges associated with such. Based on interview with the ED, record review and observation the facility was unable to produce any documentation that was provided to R1’s POA regarding the increase of level of care cost to include an updated care plan and written notice. Based on staff interview, the staff was unable to provide an explanation as to why R1’s care cost increased in March 2024.
The Department has investigated the above allegation. Based on interview, record review and observation the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the above allegation is substantiated. A deficiency is being cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. See LIC9099-D. This report was reviewed with the Executive Director, Gregory Becker and a copy of the report and appeal rights were provided. |