1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 2 of 2
During the investigation 7 Staff (S1-S7) were interviewed and 7 Resident (R1-R7). 7 out of 7 staff stated that they provide care to residents with bathing, changing, assist with feeding and ambulating. 7 out of 7 staff stated that the Medication Technician and Assisted living staff will help when a staff member calls out sick or if the Memory Care department is short staffed. 7 out of 7 staff stated that the facility will check on residents who stay in their room every hour to see if they need assistance. During visit LPA observed staff helping residents and assisting with activities. During the investigation LPA reviewed the groupings for the residents and observed that the residents are grouped together and assigned a designated staff in memory care to give showers and change adult briefs. 7 out of 7 staff stated that Assisted Living Medication Technician will help the memory care unit if they need assistance.
7 out of 7 staff stated that there are 4 caregivers on average to cover for memory care. S1 stated that the memory care unit has 33 total residents and 4 staff per shift, sometimes there is 5 in the evening more often. S1 stated that the daily schedule is from 6:00 AM to 230 PM, 2:00 PM to 10:00pm and 10:00 PM to 6:30 AM. S1 stated that there are 2 residents who have 1 on 1 caregivers and only 1 of those provide care to the residents. 5 out of 7 staff stated residents are checked on every 2 hours and changed if soiled. 1 out of 7 staff were still in training and still shadowing but still provided care to residents with senior staff.
1 out of 7 residents stated that the facility staff provide care on time. 1 out of 7 residents stated that the facility on 1 occasion took 3 hours to change adult brief but R1 stated he/she wanted only female staff to assist with care. R1 stated the facility cleans the room every week and as needed. R1 stated that he/she likes the facility and likes the staff.
Based on the interviews, observation and records review, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the above allegations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
No deficiencies cited from California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Exit interview conducted with Melissa Lummis and a copy of the report was provided. |