1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 04/13/2022, the Administrator was interviewed. Based on interview, the facility did not have any current residents who have restraining orders or any unauthorized visitations. It was stated the residents have a right to see who they want and can have visitors if they consent to it unless there is a restraining order. It was stated that if a resident’s POA does not want a resident to see a certain visitor, the resident still has their right to consent to the visitation.
Based on interview, R1’s POA did not want anyone to see R1. It was stated that R1 always wants to see his/her relative and can see his/her realize if he/she consents to the visitation. Staff (S2) stated R1's responsible party verbally stated they did not want R1's relative to visit, however, R1 always consented to seeing R1's relative.
Based on record review, there is no documentation that R1 had any restraining orders nor was the facility provided a list of unauthorized visitors from the resident and/or resident's responsible party.
Based on review of R1's POA (power of attorney) documentation, there is no documentation that allows R1's POA to restrict visitations.
The Department has investigated the above allegation. Based on interview, record review and observation the above allegation is unfounded meaning the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis.
No deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. This report was reviewed with Kim Golden and a copy of the report was provided. |