1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 12/05/2023, LPA interviewed R1’s responsible party (referred to as RP). RP stated that on 11/21/23, he/she received a phone call from the facility staff to report that R1 had a fall and PCP was notified who prescribed medication for pain. RP stated there was no mention of R1’s sustaining a wound on the left elbow.
RP became aware of R1’s wound on left elbow a day after R1 was admitted at another facility on 11/28/23 reported by the facility nurse, herein referred to as W1. RP stated that R1 moved out from the facility [Belmont Village] on 11/27/23.
On 12/08/2023, the Department interviewed staff S1. S1 stated R1 did not complain about pain, per their procedure does not require staff to report to licensing if it is not critical or does not require any hospital visit/emergency. Based on interviews, and records reviewed, of incident submitted to the department, a report was not filed with licensing addressing R1s unusual incident (injury/fall) in November 2023.
Based on records review of R1s progress note, no other reports was written after 11/21/2023 that the wound has been addressed.
On 12/09/2023 the Department interviewed witness (W1) that R1 was assessed at Belmont Village prior to R1’s placement on 11/27/23. According to W1, it was mentioned by the wellness director or nurse [at Belmont] that R1 had a fall but no mention of an open wound on R1’s left elbow during assessment. W1 stated that R1’s wound discovered when R1’s moved in day on 11/27/23 which was covered by translucent tape over the wound with yellowish color appeared to be infected and wound dressing has not been changed.
On 12/10/2023, an interview with W1 was conducted. W1 stated that the facility [Belmont] did not allow them to conduct skin assessment.
Based on the Department’s findings, record reviews and interviews, there is sufficient evidence to prove that the allegation of neglect or lack of supervision, not seeking medical attention in a timely manner, and not reporting incident to licensing agency occurred. The preponderance of evidence gathered and analyzed indicated that the allegation is true, therefore, the allegations are substantiated.
Deficiencies are cited based on California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 22. An exit interview was conducted with DRCS Jeeteeh Gigliotti and a copy of the report and appeals rights were provided.
Page 3 of 3
|