1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During visit on 10/06/2020, LPAs Marrufo and Nguyen requested the following records for residents R1, R6, R7, R10, R11, and R12: Physician's Report, Admission Agreement, LIC621 Client/Resident Personal Property and Valuables, and House Rules. Review of resident records indicate that R1, R6, R7, R10, R11, and R12 did not have any valuables claimed on their signed LIC621 Client/Resident Personal Property and Valuables forms. LPAs Marrufo and Nguyen also interviewed staff S3-S6 as well as Administrator Apostol and were given a virtual tour of the facility and observed the facility pay phone that is available for residents to use.
During interviews, ten out of ten residents and six out of six staff reported to have never observed a staff not allow a resident to make or receive phone calls. Staff and residents reported that residents can use the pay phone to make and receive calls and if residents do not have coins for the pay phone, then staff will make the office phone available for them to use or give them coins. Ten out of ten residents and six out of six staff reported during interviews to have never observed a staff treat a resident with disrespect.
During interview, R12 stated to have had personal clothing gone missing. However, R12's Admission Agreement states that resident clothing "must be declared upon admission filling out an inventory sheet, or signing a waiver stating they choose not to fill out the inventory sheet" and R12 initialed a statement declining to have personal items inventoried. In addition, four out of six interviewed staff reported that residents will report clothing missing while staff are doing their laundry for them. Moreover, Rule 4 of the facility House Rules indicates "For resident’s convenience and comfort, selected items of personal furniture and personal possessions are welcome. We suggest one doesn’t bring in anything of extreme value such as diamond and gold for they can get lost."
Based on information from interviews conducted with staff, and records reviewed, although the allegations listed above may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. No Deficiencies were cited under California Code of Regulations Title 22
This report was reviewed with Administrator Samuel Apostol. A copy of the report will be sent to him to be signed and returned to CCL. Page 2 of 2. |