1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The Administrator stated that R1 does not like to have a roommate, however, is unable to pay for the cost of a private bedroom. Administrator stated that R1 was aware that his/her bedroom would be a shared bedroom and consented to it.
It was stated that due to conflicts with R1’s previous roommate, they thought R2 would be a good fit to be R1’s roommate
Administrator stated to address R1’s sleep concerns they have provided R1 was ear plugs and reached out to R1’s case manager. It was stated that R1 also had headphone that he/she uses during the night. It was stated that due to the constant roommate switches, the facility has challenges in finding another roommate who would be compatible with R1’s needs. It was stated that it was also unfair to move residents around who are already settled and comfortable in their rooms. Administrator denied R1 reaching out to request for a specific roommate.
Based on interview with R1, it was stated that R1 had a preference for which roommate he/she preferred. R1 stated that he/she did not talk to the Administrator and staff regarding his/her roommate request. R1 stated that he/she found ear plugs inside his/her room on 04/30/2025 but R1 didn’t need that as R1 was already using noise canceling headphones. R1 states that even with the use of noise canceling headphone, R2’s snoring was too loud that he/she can hear it through the headphones resulting in sleep deprivation. R1 did not want to inform the Administrator of his/her request and consented for LPA Kabariti to inform the Administrator regarding his/her roommate request.
On 05/01/2025, the Administrator switched R1’s roommate to the preferred roommate R1 requested. Based on record review, it was stated that R1 and R3 both agreed to share a room.
The Department has investigated the above allegation. Based on interview and record review, the above allegation is unfounded meaning the allegation is false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. No deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. This report was reviewed with Administrator(ADM) Samuel Apostol and Office Manager (OM) Ivonne Chavez and a copy of the report was provided. |