1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Mr. Kaiyom states R1 calls the facility multiple times per day ever since R1 has moved out of the facility to inquire about R1's mail. Mr. Kaiyom states that each time he speaks with R1, he informs R1 that he is storing R1's mail and has the mail available any time R1 or R1's family member want to retrieve the mail.
Mr. Kaiyom stated during interview to have never hung up the phone or cut a call short with R1.
During interview, staff S1-S5 stated to have never hung up the phone on anyone. Staff S1, S2, and S3 stated to have received telephone calls from R1 and R1 asked them about R1's mail. S1, S2, and S3 stated to have never hung up the phone on R1 or cut a call short and to have always said goodbye before hanging up.
LPA Marrufo reviewed the facility telephone call log on the cordless facility telephone. The telephone call log did not have any telephone numbers associated to R1 or show R1's name. The telephone call log had multiple instances of "Wireless Number" shown, but it did not indicate the name or telephone number of the caller.
Based on information from interviews conducted with staff, and records reviewed, although the allegations listed above may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated.
No Deficiencies cited under California Code of Regulations Title 22
This report was reviewed with Saaj Kaiyom and a copy of this report was provided. |